Anthropology.net
Evolutionary Insights by Anthropology.net
Crayons of the Pleistocene
0:00
-14:36

Paid episode

The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Anthropology.net

Crayons of the Pleistocene

What a 70,000-year-old ochre crayon from Crimea tells us about Neanderthal minds

In the low, wind-cut limestone of Crimea, researchers found a sliver of ochre that refuses to behave like a simple mineral fragment. It is tapered, sharpened, and worn in ways that make it hard to see it as anything but purposeful. And its color is not accidental. It is yellow ochre, a pigment favored across prehistory for staining skin, hide, and stone.

Modified ochre fragment (ZSKVI-01). Four views of ochre fragment ZSKVI-01 displaying multiple modifications. (A) Outer friable surface exhibiting extensive scoring, pitting, and short randomly oriented striations on smoothed areas. (B) Right margin showing heavily worn microchipping. (C) Concave, harder, inner surface displaying on its right margin. (D) Fresh invasive flake scars. Scale bar, 1 cm. Credit: d’Errico et al., Sci. Adv. 11, eadx4722

The people who shaped it were Neanderthals.

It is a detail small enough to fit between fingertips, yet it pushes at a question that anthropologists have wrestled with for more than a century: How symbolic was Neanderthal life? Did they mark meaning into the world, or merely inhabit it?

Archaeological ochre pieces from Crimea. Studied archaeological coloring materials from ZSKV, ZSKVI, PRMII and MUH. Credit: d’Errico et al., Sci. Adv. 11, eadx4722

A new study led by Francesco d’Errico and colleagues, published in Science Advances,1 argues that these Crimean ochre pieces are not incidental scraps. They are tools made for marking. And they were cared for and resharpened, then used again. Their edges carry the wear of repetition, and their polish hints at hands returning to them over long intervals.

Scraped and ground ochre crayon (ZSKV-06). Ochre fragment ZSKV-06. (A) General view. (B) Macrophoto on the central portion showing rough scraping marks aligned with the object’s main axis, partially removed by oblique striations from grinding. Scale bars, 1 cm. Credit: d’Errico et al., Sci. Adv. 11, eadx4722

Neanderthals, in this telling, did not simply smash bones and knap stone. They drew, or at least attempted to leave marks that mattered.

“Symbolic behavior is not a sudden switch in the human story,” notes Dr. Helena Strauss, a Paleolithic cognitive archaeologist at the University of Tübingen. “It appears as a thread running through multiple hominin lineages, emerging when social worlds became rich enough to demand symbols.”

That thread, this research suggests, ran through the Micoquian Neanderthals who lived in Crimea roughly between 70,000 and 40,000 years ago.

Listen to this episode with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Anthropology.net to listen to this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.