Anthropology.net
Evolutionary Insights by Anthropology.net
It’s Time to Retire “Behavioral Modernity”
0:00
-24:47

Paid episode

The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Anthropology.net

It’s Time to Retire “Behavioral Modernity”

Neanderthal evidence has quietly undermined one of paleoanthropology’s most convenient organizing concepts.

In 2021, a team led by Dirk Leder published an analysis of a 51,000-year-old giant deer phalanx recovered from Einhornhöhle in Lower Saxony. The bone had been deliberately engraved with a series of cuts and scraped lines. Micro-morphometric analysis ruled out accidental modification, butchery byproduct, or carnivore damage. The angles were too consistent. The location of the incisions made no sense functionally. Someone had made this object on purpose, and the only hominins present at that time and place were Neanderthals.

51,000-year-old engraved giant deer phalanx from a late Middle Paleolithic context at Einhornhöhle, Lower Saxony, Germany. Image reproduced with the permission of Springer Nature. From Leder et al. (2021).

Leder’s team interpreted the artifact as evidence of symbolic expression. Others have suggested it could have been utilitarian, a spool or a fishing sinker, which doesn’t actually rule out aesthetic intent — the same argument has been made about particularly fine Acheulean handaxes for decades. What nobody seriously argues is that the object is accidental or meaningless.

This kind of evidence has been accumulating for years. And a new paper by philosopher Anton Killin, published in Biological Theory,1 argues that it has now accumulated to the point where it breaks something: the concept of “behavioral modernity” itself.

a Acheulean handaxe. Image reproducible under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Source: Diez-Martín et al. (2016). b Late Acheulean handaxe with fossil of Cretaceous bivalve mollusk centrally located. Image reproducible under the terms of Creative Commons by Attribution; source: Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge/Mark W. Moore, Museum of Stone Tools. URL = https://une.pedestal3d.com/r/EKNQYcekuv (Accessed 12 June 2024).

The argument is worth taking seriously, because it isn’t just about Neanderthals. It’s about what happens when a scientific concept outlives its usefulness.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Anthropology & Primatology.