Anthropology.net
Evolutionary Insights by Anthropology.net
When the Ice Let Go: How Tiny Crystals Are Rewriting Stonehenge’s Origin Story
0:00
-13:45

Paid episode

The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Anthropology.net

When the Ice Let Go: How Tiny Crystals Are Rewriting Stonehenge’s Origin Story

A new geological study weakens the case for glacial transport and strengthens a quieter, more demanding explanation: Neolithic people moved Stonehenge’s stones themselves.

Stonehenge has always invited large explanations. Ice sheets grinding south. Rivers carrying boulders like driftwood. Or human communities coordinating feats of transport that strain modern intuition. For more than a century, scholars have toggled between those options, often splitting along disciplinary lines. Geologists pointed to glaciers. Archaeologists pointed to people.

A recent study published in Communications Earth & Environment1 nudges that long argument toward a reckoning. By tracking the chemical fingerprints of minerals no wider than a grain of sand, the authors arrive at a stark conclusion: the glaciers that once shaped much of Britain never reached Salisbury Plain. If ice did not arrive, then neither did Stonehenge’s stones. Humans, almost certainly Homo sapiens, are left holding the rope.

An example of how the stones may have been moved at Stonehenge. A Perry/Unsplash

This is not a romantic claim about heroic builders hauling megaliths across the countryside. It is a careful, skeptical argument built from zircon and apatite crystals pulled from modern river sediments. The absence of evidence, in this case, is the evidence.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Anthropology & Primatology.